What is better, battlecrusiors or carriers?

Status
Not open for further replies.

iamshort

Member!
Joined
Jun 15, 2003
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
Okay, I want to know everyones opoin on which damn capital ship is better, so I can use them more often.
 

Static

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2003
Messages
4,356
Reaction score
7
Location
Joe's Garage.
in my oppinion Battlecruisers. But i am to lazy to do the math for the 8 interceptors and upgraded dmg... All i know is they both get owned by scourges. So when fighting zerg dont use to many capital ships.
 

panthr_dude

Member!
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
i say carrier because the enemys can get confused with the interceptors and will attack them instead of the carriers letting the carriers stay longer. And then the interceptors can do multiple damgae cause they all each attack different tagets
 

Sakuhta

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
3,019
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas
No question. Yamatoe cannon knocks out all but 40 shields, and the BC has more health anyway. :-/. Plus the Carrier cost extra time and money for interceptors.

-Sakuhta
 

eSc0

Member!
Joined
Jul 22, 2003
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
depends what u play either money maps or regular maps
i guess carriers would be better for regular maps but cruisers own in money maps unless of course the other player uses static field on them :/
 

aphextwin

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2003
Messages
4,394
Reaction score
0
bc because i tested them by attacking each other at the same time... the bc won by like 100 hp.
 

a@...

Member!
Joined
May 26, 2003
Messages
846
Reaction score
0
Location
Tarsonis
Carriers are better. but Carriers have weakness too.
I wouldn't make BCs if my enemie is making Carriers.
 

Sakuhta

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
3,019
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas
Originally posted by Ubuu
Not if the carrier was controlled by a human player.
Makes no difference. Same damage, same health.

-Sakuhta
 

Ubuu

Member!
Joined
Nov 2, 2002
Messages
367
Reaction score
0
Location
In the same forum as you, stupid
Website
forum.bodybuilding.com
Originally posted by sakuhta
Makes no difference. Same damage, same health.

-Sakuhta
O yeah, i forgot to say "micro". Carrier traveling speed are faster than BC, interceptors attacks farther than BC can shoot, and even better, interceptors attacks while carrier retreats. Carriers will beat BC with Hit and run.
 

Sakuhta

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
3,019
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas
Lmao...no not quite. Micro won't work in a 1v1 and no carriers don't outrun BC sorry.(tried befoe :( )

-Sakuhta
 

senureMiget

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2003
Messages
252
Reaction score
0
bcs are better because not only do the opponents get disoriented but the user does too

plus i like the bcs accent
 

Sakuhta

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
3,019
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas
Originally posted by Ubuu
Figures you would respond. Thats why i have a replay to back it up.:) The replay might go awkward for those of you with different version of SC.
For one yes of course I'd respong to voice my opinion. And as for the rep "going odd" if someone has a diff. version they can't play the replay man..

-Sakuhta
 

Ubuu

Member!
Joined
Nov 2, 2002
Messages
367
Reaction score
0
Location
In the same forum as you, stupid
Website
forum.bodybuilding.com
Originally posted by sakuhta
...no carriers don't outrun BC sorry.
Try it yourself and see which is faster. Watch the replay.

Edit:
Originally posted by sakuhta
For one yes of course I'd respong to voice my opinion. And as for the rep "going odd" if someone has a diff. version they can't play the replay man..

-Sakuhta
You need to have patch 1.10 installed for it to be viewed properly. I'm sure you guys have it by now.
 

TheLightsOut

Member!
Joined
Aug 13, 2003
Messages
223
Reaction score
0
Location
Right behind you...
1on1 BC wins.

5on5 BC's win.

12on12 BC's win.

Carriers do more 'mass' damage, but BC's are much better all around. Especially with the Yamato cannon.
 

Ubuu

Member!
Joined
Nov 2, 2002
Messages
367
Reaction score
0
Location
In the same forum as you, stupid
Website
forum.bodybuilding.com
Originally posted by TheLightsOut
1on1 BC wins.

5on5 BC's win.

12on12 BC's win.

Carriers do more 'mass' damage, but BC's are much better all around. Especially with the Yamato cannon.
If you watch the replay, you would notice how nearly impossible it was for the BC to shoot me down while my interceptors wrecked him, even though he had shot me a few times, i had to stay near the BC so my interceptor will still attack it. The only way the BC could have gotten me is either firing Yamato cannon at me or "try" to destroy the interceptors.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New threads

Top