Is that a dragoon?

[TrongaMonga]

Meh, not really. They were a good support unit but that's all.

But yeah, if there's BCs, there's probably carriers, altough the Warp Rays make short work of them.

 

[Vadriel]

It'd be interesting, what with the game's obviously updated graphics engine, if Carriers could hold significantly more Interceptors this time round.

 

[Renzokuken]

Yeah eight was always a measly number for the size of a carrier.

 

[Vadriel]

It'd make the carriers a bit more effective, and if they were more expensive due to their better usefulness, it would provide a decent weakness balance as well, since instead of just eliminating 8 stinging hornetships, destroying a carrier took down a dozen or so.

 

[TrongaMonga]

Meh, I still think eight was a good number. I mean, the whole purpose of the carriers was to distract enemy fire, really.

 

[Vadriel]

Heh, I always used them as a storm unit. ^_^

 

[TrongaMonga]

I never had more than 2 carriers in my army, unless it was a money map

 

[Renzokuken]

Well carrier + zealot combo ****ing raped cos you couldn't target the zealots and it'd distract your enemies fire for a second or two before they decided what carrier to focus fire.

 

[Vadriel]

Only problem with mass carriers is that they tend to clump together and get pwnt by a psistorm.

Well-micro'd carrier armies own.

 

[TrongaMonga]

The only problem with that is that carriers are god damn expensive.

 

[Vadriel]

So is everything Protoss. Mass carriers isn't THAT hard, except maybe on a low-resource map...but then again I always prefered money maps. =)

 

[Emperor Pan I]

Only problem with mass carriers is that they tend to clump together and get pwnt by a psistorm.

Well-micro'd carrier armies own.

well micro'd anything owns non-micro garbage

 

[Jetfusion]

I don't know what shit you guys are smokin (evidently the good kin) cause that most def looks like a immortal............

 

[Phoenix2003]

The only problem with that is that carriers are god damn expensive.

Pro players are willing to pay the price for them. Hmmm, should I follow your logic of expensive = suck or should I go by pro players, hmmmmm?

 

[Tw@]

is that a dragoon?

?

thats what she said

 

[TrongaMonga]

Pro players are willing to pay the price for them. Hmmm, should I follow your logic of expensive = suck or should I go by pro players, hmmmmm?

That's a fancy, yet kinda pointless argument.

I never said carriers sucked, I only said their only problem is that their damn expensive.

Don't fight where there's no fight, mate.

 

[Wing Zero]

I don't know what shit you guys are smokin (evidently the good kin) cause that most def looks like a immortal............

you sure?

 

[Asterisk]

I want you guys to note that those Reavers look much to much like the ones in StarCraft. I was going to say that the Dragoon was an Observer, because it looked like that from long range. From close range you can clearly see that its a Dragoon. BTW, this rose my suspicions about this picture being before StarCraft II, meaning it was when the Protoss hid the Colossus in uninhabited Moons and Stars. :-/

So you really cant say it is based in StarCraft II. Incase you didn't know, Dragoons are in the Map Editor, and might I remind you that this editor is going to be better then that of WarCraft III's? So it wont matter really.

Edit: There's Corsairs in the background too. If I recall StarCraft II doesn't have Corsairs anymore, it states they are gone in the Phoenix profile. So that gives more proof.